In this title, the error in the root postulate of the theory and the local flaws are shared ( ). When we distinguished the kinds of relativity and decided to choice the correct one ( hypothetetical relativity like the relation a ball/player/ground) for light’s motion, our scientific vision/wisdom will improve on universal scale. We have to analyze the essence and kinds of relativity. These clues are not too difficult to consider. When the ball represents the photon the player as light source the ground as outer space/LCS light kinematics will become transparent and functional. The ball's speed is a relative value according to ground not the player. 3- Is to understand the relation a player, a ball and the ground difficult? The ground is a co-reference frame for the motion analysis of the player and the ball. While the isotropic results of the measurement and MM tests are present and pointing out that we can just measure the velocity of light on a universal scale it is not scientific to still accept and process as relative value to local objects. This (**) different option could be ignored. When the photons pack half X and the photons pack half y meet on the screen**, the experimenter assumes that the single light pack halves are interfering. Similarly, the light is also continuous in MM test. However, the method of measuring the velocity of light is similar to that of a light clock (mirrored dual path, continuous photon current) the experimenter intends and supposes that he is measuring with a single identified photon whereas, it is possible to start with photon x and finish the experiment with photon y. 2- In our measurement of the speed of light, we habitually label the result value relative to the current environment. When the road friction is over, the car is now transferred to the oblique throw state with the previous speed being the first speed. For example: 1- The car gains speed by applying force to the road and pushing the road and the value of the speed is exactly " genuine relative" to the road. (*) Essence: Taking deeper meaning into account that is how relativity occurs which factors are involved. Is it possible that such a test was being applied to us? I wrote a science fiction story on this theme (einsteinRF It is very interesting and surprising that human cognitive capacity has not been able to distinguish a simple nuance (about the essence of relativity*) for over 100 years. Theory is somehow introduced into their lives/paradigms by a young scientist like Einstein and developments are followed.
One of them could be special theory of relativity.
#Spacie lcs voice series#
Why don't aliens get direct contact? If we discover a world-like planet and wanted to relate to living intelligent organisms, we would want to run a series of tests to understand their cognitive capacities.
0 kommentar(er)
